7 Feedback Mistakes Even Great Leaders Make: And how to avoid the silent missteps that cost you trust, momentum, and growth.
Leadership isn’t about avoiding mistakes; it’s about recognizing them quickly and moving forward. Few areas expose blind spots faster than feedback.
Even high-performing leaders, with a track record of results and respect, fall into subtle patterns that undermine their feedback effectiveness. These aren’t dramatic failures; they’re quiet cultural missteps and habits that seem harmless but can silently unravel team trust, morale, and performance.
Here are seven of the most common and overlooked feedback mistakes that even great leaders make.
1. Waiting Too Long to Give Feedback
The project is complete. The moment has passed. And now you're circling back with feedback that would have been valuable two weeks ago. Sound familiar?
Many leaders delay feedback in the name of “finding the right time” or “letting things settle.” But in reality, the longer you wait, the less relevant and actionable your feedback becomes. By the time you deliver it, the person may not even remember the situation clearly, or worse, they’ve already repeated the behavior.
What to do instead:
Build a rhythm of short, real-time feedback loops. This doesn’t mean constant correction. It means reflection ingrained in your weekly routine: “What worked?” “What didn’t?” “What can we adjust?” When feedback becomes a habit, it loses its sting and gains traction.
2. Wrapping Constructive Feedback in Too Much Praise
The feedback sandwich, composed of praise, criticism, and praise, has good intentions, but it often clouds the message. Your team leaves unsure whether they’re doing a great job or need to improve.
When praise serves as a cushion for discomfort, it loses authenticity. Over time, people start to associate compliments with forthcoming criticism, and trust deteriorates.
What to do instead:
Be clear and kind, not vague and nice. Offer praise generously, but keep it separate from correction. A better model: begin with shared goals, deliver feedback with clarity, and conclude with support for growth.
3. Making It About Personality Instead of Behavior
Telling someone “You’re careless” doesn’t inspire growth; it triggers defense. You’ve shifted the feedback from action to identity, and now they’re focused on protecting themselves, not improving.
Effective feedback targets what someone did, not who they are. That shift isn’t just semantics; it’s psychological safety in action.
What to do instead:
Describe the behavior, explain the impact, and link it to expectations. Instead of “You’re disorganized,” try:
“When the report came in late, it delayed the team’s timeline. Let’s talk about how to structure future deadlines so we stay aligned.”
You’re not attacking character, you’re coaching performance.
4. Assuming Silence Means Agreement
You shared your feedback. No one pushed back. No questions. Just a polite nod.
You walk away feeling great until the behavior doesn’t change. Or worse, you find out the message was misunderstood, met with resentment, or ignored.
Silence isn’t the same as understanding. In many teams, especially hierarchical ones, silence can signal discomfort, fear, or disengagement.
What to do instead:
Ask follow-up questions that invite real dialogue:
“How did that land for you?”
“What would make this easier to act on?”
“What are your thoughts on this approach?”
Feedback should be a conversation, not a verdict.
5. Using “Constructive” as a Cover for Negative
Some leaders label all difficult feedback as “constructive,” but use it solely when giving criticism. Over time, that word begins to feel like code for “you messed up.”
When feedback consistently leans negative, people cease to associate it with growth. Instead, it becomes something to brace for.
What to do instead:
Broaden your feedback language. Reinforce what’s going well. Share examples of progress and improvement just as frequently as corrections. Let your team associate feedback with possibility, not punishment.
Great feedback is honest, yet also optimistic.
6. Giving Feedback Only One Way
If feedback flows in only one direction, top-down, you aren’t fostering a feedback culture. Instead, you’re reinforcing a hierarchy.
Even the most self-aware leaders have blind spots. If your team doesn’t feel empowered to reflect on your leadership, you’re operating with incomplete information and missing valuable opportunities for growth.
What to do instead:
Use 360-degree feedback tools, post-project debriefs, or even anonymous forms. And when someone gives you feedback? Thank them. Act on it. Show that it matters.
Trust deepens when feedback becomes a loop, not a spotlight.
7. Forgetting to Follow Up
You provided feedback. It was clear, timely, and well-received. But then… silence. No follow-up. No acknowledgment of improvement. No checking in to see what changed.
Without follow-up, feedback feels performative. Your team starts to wonder: Was that real? Did it matter? Do they even notice when I grow?
What to do instead:
Circle back. Acknowledge when things improve. Keep the conversation going. When you follow up, you signal that growth is a journey you’re on together.
And that’s when feedback stops feeling like judgment and starts feeling like support.
Final Thoughts: Feedback Is a System, Not a Script
Even great leaders sometimes get feedback wrong. The difference is that great leaders are willing to reflect, adjust, and evolve.
Every mistake on this list is fixable, and every fix represents an opportunity to lead more clearly, courageously, and humanely.
Feedback isn’t just a tool; it’s a trust-building system, a culture-defining rhythm, and a leadership advantage hiding in plain sight. When you consistently execute it, you not only help your team grow, but you also help them stay.
This article was also featured on Medium.
About the Author
Clayton Thompson, Ph.D., is a Colonel in the U.S. Air Force with over 20 years of leadership experience. He is the author of the upcoming book RA-RA Feedback: It’s Not a Moment. It’s a System! for building trust, accelerating growth, and creating a leadership advantage.